This is where Adam Spooner writes.

The Dangerous Mr. Kahn

Posted on

David Clemens in his article, The Dangerous Mr. Khan, writes,

… Why do I call Mr. Khan dangerous? … Imagine the consequences if his videos did become the DOS or Windows of education: tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of young minds, all fed by Mr. Khan’s fizzy version of history. Not only would all students absorb the same value judgments, goofy comments, and cultural relativism, they would also conclude that Mr. Khan’s factoids constitute knowledge of history.

To which Mr. Khan replies,

I start most of [my videos] telling the listener to be skeptical of anything I tell them or anyone tells them; that no matter how footnoted something is, in the end it is dependent on people’s accounts—the people who weren’t killed—which are subject to bias (no matter how well-intentioned). Very few history books or professors do this. If anything, they create a false sense of certainty.